eBulletin

Early Warning System eBulletin – June 2025

Recently, we have been hearing about overpayments of legacy benefits during the managed migration process. This bulletin looks at what should happen in these situations, and issues we have been seeing with how it’s working in practice. The Early Warning System collects case studies from welfare rights advisers and members of the public. We use this evidence in CPAG's campaigning, policy and legal work.
Published on
Relevant to
England, Wales, Scotland,

Support for advisers

Free, expert advice on welfare benefits through our dedicated advice line, as well as specialist support with complex cases such as Upper Tribunal appeals and judicial review processes, and specialist help for those advising particular groups.
eBulletin

Early Warning System eBulletin – March 2025

The Early Warning System collects case studies from welfare rights advisers. We use this evidence in CPAG's campaigning, policy and legal work. So far this year, we’ve heard a lot about managed migration.
Published on
Relevant to
all of the UK

PIP appeals

If you disagree with a DWP decision about your entitlement to personal independence payment (PIP) you may be able to appeal and have your appeal decided by an independent tribunal.
Test case

Erosion of disabled carer’s TSDPE due to addition of LCWRA element and removal of carer element

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MJ [2025] UKUT 035 (AAC)
This is a challenge to the policy of the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in relation to MJ, a claimant in receipt of the carer element and transitional SDP element, to erode the whole of her transitional SDP element when she was found to have limited capability for work and work related activity. The UT allowed the SSWP’s appeal and re-made the FTT decision in MJ’s favour, finding that she had been unlawfully discriminated against.
Published on
Relevant to
all of the UK
Test case

Two-child limit non-consensual conception exception ordering rule

R (LMN and EFG) v SSWP [2024] EWHC 2577 (Admin)
This is a challenge to the non-consensual conception exception ordering rule within the two-child limit. The application for judicial review was initially refused permission on the papers. At a renewal hearing on 10 October 2024, the High Court granted permission for the case to go to a substantive hearing.
Published on
Relevant to
all of the UK
Test case

Right to reside for EEA national with pre-settled status: preparatory steps and self-employment and self-sufficiency for ineligible partners

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v VB and AD [2024] UKUT 212 (AAC)
The Upper Tribunal considered whether VB, a Norwegian national with pre-settled status, had a right to reside for the purposes of claiming Universal Credit because she was i) a self-employed person, ii) a self-sufficient person with comprehensive sickness insurance, and iii) had retained worker status.
Published on
Relevant to
all of the UK