Skip to main content
CPAG Welfare Rights Home

User account menu

  • Log in

Utility menu - Welfare Rights

  • CPAG Home
  • Benefit rates
  • Shop
  • Training & events

Main navigation

  • Support for advisers
    • Advice line for advisers
    • Support for advisers in England and Wales
    • Support for advisers in Scotland
    • Tell us about your case
  • Handbooks
    • Online handbooks
    • Print handbooks
  • Key topics
    • PIP appeals
    • Maximising income
    • Universal credit
    • Migration to universal credit
    • Survivors of domestic abuse
    • Benefits for migrants
    • Debt
    • Housing costs
    • Personal independence payment
    • Sanctions and work-related requirements
    • Work capability assessment
  • Tools & templates
    • About our tools and templates
    • Universal credit
    • Migration to universal credit
    • Benefits for migrants
    • Personal independence payment
    • Work capability assessment
    • Revision, supersession and appeal procedure
    • Judicial review
    • All tools and templates
  • Benefits in Scotland
    • Scottish benefits
    • More information about benefits in Scotland
    • Other CPAG resources on benefits in Scotland
  • Bulletins & articles
    • Welfare Rights Bulletin
    • Articles
    • eBulletins
  • Test cases
    • About legal test cases
    • Support with an Upper Tribunal case
    • Test case updates
    • Refer a test case
    • Support with the judicial review process
Menu
Search

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Welfare rights
  3. Test cases and legal challenges
  4. Legal test cases

Universal credit, earned income and monthly pay

R (Johnson, Woods, Barrett & Stewart) v SSWP [2019] EWHC 23 (Admin); SSWP v Johnson, Woods, Barrett & Stewart [2020] EWCA Civ 778
This case successfully challenged the rigidity of the monthly assessment period regime under universal credit (UC) and the way that earned income is calculated for certain claimants. The case concerned four single working mothers whose regular monthly pay dates for their wages fell close to the start/end of their assessment periods, resulting in them sometimes having two paydays in one assessment period. This issue caused them to experience fluctuations of their income and significant cash losses.

Current status: Court of Appeal judgment handed down 22 June 2020. Implementing regulations came into force on 16 November 2020. The adjustment or ‘fix’ provided for by these regulations initially operated manually but, as of August 2021, it now operates automatically.

View the regulations

Read the Court of Appeal judgment

  • Overview
  • Background facts
  • Legal issues
  • Changes to universal credit regulations following the judgment
  • What can a claimant in a similar position do?

Overview

This case successfully challenged the rigidity of the monthly assessment period regime under universal credit (UC) and the way that earned income is calculated for certain claimants. The case concerned four single working mothers whose regular monthly pay dates for their wages fell close to the start/end of their assessment periods, resulting in them sometimes having two paydays in one assessment period. This issue caused them to experience fluctuations of their income and significant cash losses.    

The Court of Appeal found that SSWP’s failure to resolve the problem for such claimants was irrational. SSWP accepted the Court of Appeal's findings and has laid amending regulations to rectify the issue faced by the claimants. The changes came into force on 16 November 2020.

Background facts

The claim was originally brought on behalf of three single working mothers, represented by CPAG, and was joined with a similar case brought by Leigh Day solicitors representing another single working mother.

Each claimant:

  1. was paid a monthly salary towards the end of the month (eg. on the 28th of each month or the ‘last banking day of the month’); and
  2. had a UC assessment period which started and ended close to the end of the month.

As is the case for many employees, the claimants’ actual pay dates were occasionally brought forward to take account of weekends and bank holidays. On the other hand, the start/end date of their UC assessment periods remained fixed. The result of the ‘clash’ between their monthly paydays and start/end of their assessment periods, was that the claimants were sometimes paid twice in one assessment period. For example, in November–December 2017 one claimant, whose assessment period ran from 30th of one month to 29th of the following and who was paid on the last working day of the month, was paid on Thursday 30 November and Friday 29 December, thereby receiving two salary payments within that assessment period.

Impact on the claimants

Whenever this issue outlined above arose, the claimants were treated as having earned twice their usual salary in one assessment period and so received a significantly reduced UC award, causing obvious cash flow problems for somebody managing on a very tightly balanced budget.

Further, as the claimants were working parents, they were entitled to a work allowance. Whenever they were treated as receiving two months' wages in one assessment period, only one work allowance was applied to those earnings. They therefore lost out on the benefit of one work allowance against one month’s salary. This cash loss was not compensated for by the fact that the following assessment period they were treated as receiving no wages and so received the maximum UC allowance.

Between them, the claimants fell into rent arrears, defaulted on council tax, incurred bank overdraft charges, borrowed money and even become reliant on food banks to make ends meet. One of the mothers had to decline a promotion and put her professional aspirations on ice because of the way the UC system treated her earnings. Another felt compelled to give up her job to look for alternative employment where there was no clash between her pay date and UC assessment period.

Legal issues

High Court

The Divisional Court hearing took place on 27–28 November 2018 and judgment was given on 11 January 2019, finding in favour of the claimants.

Although the claimants originally advanced their claims on different grounds, more of which below, the court found that SSWP had incorrectly interpreted her own regulations regarding "earned income" (namely regulation 54 Universal Credit Regulations 2013) and “wrongly assumed that where salaries for two different months were received during the same assessment period, the combined salaries from the two months were to be treated as earned income in respect of that assessment period.”

Read the High Court judgment

Court of Appeal

Following the SSWP’s application to appeal the Administrative Court’s judgment, the Court of Appeal hearing took place on 19–20 May 2020 and judgment was handed down on 22 June 2020 again finding in favour of the four claimants.

Read the Court of Appeal judgment

View the Court of Appeal order

Johnson Court of Appeal order
File type / size
pdf / 1.03mb

Irrationality

After considering arguments made on behalf of the claimants that had been raised in the original application for judicial review, the Court of Appeal unanimously found in favour of the claimants on the ground that the variations in their UC awards and the loss of the benefit of the work allowance, purely as a result of being paid their salaries on a day close to the start/end of their assessment period, were perverse and irrational. The court noted:

“The threshold for establishing irrationality is very high, but it is not insuperable. This case is, in my judgment, one of the rare instances where the SSWP’s refusal to put in place a solution to this very specific problem is so irrational that I have concluded that the threshold is met because no reasonable SSWP would have struck the balance in that way.” (paragraph 108)

Key factors considered in reaching this decision included the number of people affected, the duration of the impact on them, the arbitrary occurrence of the problem and the inconsistency between the effect of the problem and the aims of the UC regime.

In her judgment, Rose LJ observed that the changes to the claimants UC awards that occurred as a result of the timing of their paydays “lead to significant variations not only in the benefit award but in the income for the household from benefits and salary in a particular assessment period. They cause considerable hardship and they create perverse incentives affecting a claimant’s employment choices, cutting across the policy of the overall scheme.” (paragraph 59).

Further, the court rejected the SSWP’s argument that there was no real loss of the work allowances as the system was not designed to give them one when there was a pay-date ‘clash.’ The court noted that the loss is even greater in 2020 than it was in 2018 when the case began – for a claimant receiving support in their UC for housing costs, the work allowance was worth £192 at the time the case started rising to £292 when the appeal was heard (for those without housing costs in their UC award the work allowance was £397 and is now £512).

The SSWP’s argument that the UC computer program could not easily be modified to solve the problem similarly did not find favour with the court.

Discrimination

At the Court of Appeal stage, the court heard arguments on behalf of both parties as to whether the Universal Credit regulations are discriminatory, contrary to Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the ‘Convention’) when taken in conjunction with Article 1 of the First Protocol. This issue had originally been raised by the claimants in their initial application for judicial review. However, ultimately, the court did not find it necessary to make further findings on this point in light of its dismissal of SSWP’s appeal on the grounds of irrationality.

Interpretation

The Court of Appeal found in favour of the claimants on a different basis from the Administrative Court, rejecting the lower court’s approach to the interpretation of regulation 54 of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013. Whilst it was in principle open to the court to consider the interpretation of regulation 54 in the context of section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998, which requires the courts to read legislative provisions in a way which is compatible with Convention rights, so far as is possible, the court chose not to address this in its judgment.

Accordingly, regulation 54, as it is currently drafted, means that a person’s earned income is that income actually received in an assessment period irrespective of when the money was actually earned.

Changes to universal credit regulations following the judgment

The Universal Credit (Earned Income) Amendment Regulations 2020 (2020 No. 1138) come into force on 16 November 2020. The amending regulations make changes to regulation 61 of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013, which governs how SSWP calculates earned income. The Johnson issue is addressed by creating a power for SSWP to treat one of two wage payments received/reported in the same assessment period as earnings in respect of a different assessment period (regulation 61(6), as amended). This only applies to claimants who are paid on a regular monthly basis. In circumstances where such a reallocation has been made, SSWP also has the power to make consequential adjustments that are needed “to avoid duplication or to maintain a regular payment pattern” (regulation 61(7), as amended).

What can a claimant in a similar position do?

Individuals facing the Johnson issue may have to take different steps depending on when the assessment period(s) in which they receive two lots of wages falls.

Claimants who are facing this issue on an ongoing basis can only rely on the revised regulation 61 after 16 November 2020. The new powers contained in the amended regulation take effect in accordance with paragraph 32 of Schedule 1 of the Universal Credit, Personal Independence Payment, Jobseeker’s Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance (Decision and Appeals) Regulations 2013 (2013/381). Paragraph 32 provides that for existing universal credit awards, where a change in the legislation results in a change of circumstances requiring a superseding decision, that decision will take effect from the first day of the next assessment period after the change in legislation. In practice, this means that it is only when two monthly wages are received in an assessment period which starts on or after 16 November 2020 that the revised legislation can be relied upon. 

For all assessment periods beginning before 16 November 2020 in which two monthly wage payments have been received, we would encourage advisers to request a mandatory reconsideration and subsequent appeal of decisions. Such appeals will need to rely directly on the irrationality finding in the Johnson Court of Appeal decision and can additionally raise Article 14 non-discrimination arguments and the fact that given the finding of irrationality in Johnson there can be no justification for treating those monthly paid earners who happen to have a pay day which is on or around their UC assessment period start and end dates less favourably than those monthly paid earners who have no such clash and so experience no fluctuation in their UC payments or loss of the work allowance. 

We understand that based on the Court of Appeal's finding that the pre-16 November 2020 method of calculating earned income is unlawful for those monthly paid employees who receive two monthly payments in one assessment period, tribunals have not upheld decisions applying the original method and instead allowed the appeals.

A mandatory reconsideration request template for claimants who are paid monthly and have lost out on work allowance as a result of receiving two wage payments in one assessment period is available.  

A mandatory reconsideration request template for claimants who have faced the same issue as the claimants in Johnson and have additionally been subjected to the benefit cap as a result of being treated as receiving no wage payments in an assessment period is also available.

Where a client’s pay situation is similar to but not on all fours with that of the claimants in Johnson, for example, paid fortnightly or paid four weekly rather than monthly, there will be certain assessment periods where a claimant receives an 'additional' earnings payment purely due to the nature of their pay cycle rather than any issue of being paid 'early' so as not to be paid on a non-banking day.  In that situation, the Upper Tribunal has in LG v SSWP CSUC/280/2020 (a case concerning a 4 weekly paid claimant) held that the approach to earned income is not unlawful.

Separately, for cases paid four-weekly and benefit capped because they do not meet the threshold for the earnings exemption, advisers may wish to visit our test case page 'Universal credit, benefit cap and those paid 4 weekly’ for further information on a related case.

Test case
Published on
22 March 2021
Relevant to
all of the UK
Status
Concluded

    Advice for advisers

    Free, expert advice on benefit and tax credit issues if you’re a frontline adviser or support worker.

    Contact the advice line.

    • [email protected]
    • [email protected]

    WR Footer

    • Become a subscriber
    • Advice line for advisers
    • Training and events
    • eLearning
    • CPAG shop

    CPAG's Advice and Rights Team

    • Follow us on Twitter

    © 2025 CPAG | Child Poverty Action Group is a charity registered in England and Wales (registration number 294841) and in Scotland (registration number SC039339)

    Company limited by guarantee registered in England (registration number 1993854)

    Housekeeping (footer)

    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy policy
    • Cookies
    • Terms and conditions
    • Feedback and complaints
    Site built by Agile Collective
    End Child Poverty Fundraising Regulator badge with validation link
    • Child poverty in the UK
      • Poverty: facts and figures
      • What is poverty?
      • Causes of poverty
      • Effects of poverty
      • Ending child poverty
    • What we do
      • Our impact
      • Our objectives
      • Our campaigns
        • Imagine
        • End child poverty
        • End child poverty in Scotland
        • Scottish Campaign on Rights to Social Security
        • Past campaigns
      • Project work
        • Cost of the School Day
          • Resources for tackling poverty in schools
            • All Cost of the School Day resources
              • Talking about costs and money at school - advice from parents and carers
              • Create poverty aware school communities
              • Show leadership and take action
              • Communicate about costs and money
              • Offer confidential and supportive conversations
            • Toolkits
            • Calendar
            • eLearning
            • Ideas Bank
              • Awareness, values and ethos
                • Understanding poverty in your area
                • Cost of the School Day Information Booklet for Families
                • Nurturing approaches
                • Rebranding support to boost uptake
              • Entitlements and financial support
                • Boosting free school meal uptake
                • Family support staff
                • Offering support and referrals
                • Promoting support
              • School uniform
                • Simple, affordable and inclusive uniform policies
                • School and cluster run uniform banks
                • Providing new uniform and clothing
                • Parent-led uniform stall
              • Eating at school
                • Breakfast clubs
                • Breakfast, breaktimes and lunch
                • Boosting free school meal uptake
              • Consulting and planning
                • Listening to families
                • Parents leading consultation
                • Children consulting their school community
                • Whole school approaches
                • Creating a Cost of the School Day policy with learners
                • Cost of the School Day calendar, created by learners
              • Events, celebrations and fundraising
                • Pre-loved prom initiative
                • Supporting attendance and easing pressure
                • World Book Week in Dundee
                • Stress-free Halloween celebrations at school
                • Non-stigmatising online fundraising
              • Learners in the lead
                • Cost of the School Day pupil groups
                • Pupils asking parents and carers about costs
                • Young people sharing their views about uniform at the Scottish Parliament
                • Learners take universal free school meal call to the Scottish Parliament
                • Talking directly to politicians about cost barriers at school
                • Cost of the School Day pupil group interview their Headteacher
              • Communicating with families
                • Building relationships and keeping in touch
                • Open and clear written communication about support
                • Communicating commitment to equity
                • Letting everyone know
                • Engaging with partners in the community to share information with families
                • Improved attendance through support and communication
              • Trips, clubs and experiences
                • Funding trips
                • Offering support for trips
              • Learning and resources
                • Digital devices, connectivity and curriculum costs
                • Preparation station
                • After school study cafes
              • Local authority approaches
                • Equity in South Lanarkshire
                • Kit for all, Dundee
                • Financial inclusion support officers in Glasgow
                • Dundee City Council's Cost of the School Day
                • Involving young people in financial inclusion in East Ayrshire schools
              • Parental involvement
                • Parents in partnership
                • Parent equality groups
                • Working with parent groups on costs
            • Big Question report and film
          • Voice network and Youth Voice
            • Voice network in Scotland
            • Voice network news and opportunities - Scotland
            • Voice network activities - Scotland
              • Voice network activities - raising awareness
              • Voice network activities - asking everyone about costs
              • Voice network activities - taking action
            • Youth Voice in Wales
            • Youth Voice in England
          • Contact the Cost of the School Day team
          • The Cost of the School Day reports, blogs and briefings
        • Early Warning System
          • About the Early Warning System
          • Contact the Early Warning System team
          • Early Warning System findings
        • Projects in England and Wales
          • Cost of the School Day
          • Early Warning System
          • Secure Futures for Children and Families
          • Managed migration
          • Universal credit, digitalisation and the rule of law
          • Your Work Your Way
        • Projects in Scotland
          • Strengthening Social Security: research into the five family payments
      • CPAG in Scotland
      • The CPAG team
        • CPAG staff
        • CPAG trustees
        • CPAG's patron and ambassadors
        • CPAG trainers
    • Policy and research
      • Findings from our projects
        • The Cost of a Child reports
        • Cost of the School Day reports, blogs and briefings
        • Early Warning System findings
        • Managed migration research project findings
        • Your Work Your Way - findings from the project
        • Secure Futures for Children and Families
        • Universal credit, digitalisation and the rule of law
      • Our position
        • The two-child limit: our position
        • The benefit cap: our position
      • Policy briefings and reports
        • David Webster briefings on benefit sanctions
      • CPAG's Poverty journal
      • Policy books from CPAG
    • Welfare rights
      • Support for advisers
        • Advice line for advisers
        • Support for advisers in England and Wales
          • Support with the judicial review process
            • What judicial review is and how it can help
            • Judicial review template letters
              • Guide to using CPAG's judicial review pre-action letter templates
              • Universal credit and migration to universal credit
              • Other benefits and payments
              • Benefits for people in particular circumstances
              • Decisions, delays and challenging decisions
            • Pursuing to court and finding a solicitor
          • Support with an Upper Tribunal case
        • Support for advisers in Scotland
          • Advising low-income families in Scotland
          • Advising disabled people and carers in Scotland
          • Advising migrant groups in Scotland
          • Advising students in Scotland
          • Advising kinship carers in Scotland
          • Advising care-experienced young people in Scotland
          • Advising families with a child in the care system in Scotland
        • Tell us about your case
      • Handbooks
        • Online handbooks
        • Print handbooks
      • Key topics
        • PIP appeals
          • Introduction
          • Before you appeal
          • Submitting your appeal
          • Checking the law, facts and evidence
          • Writing the submission for your appeal
          • Your appeal hearing
          • What to do when you get the tribunal's decision
        • Maximising income
        • Universal credit
          • Universal credit - the basics
          • Universal credit and sanctions
        • Migration to universal credit
        • Survivors of domestic abuse
          • Financial help for families fleeing domestic abuse
          • Unwanted payments of abuser’s benefit into your account
          • Exceptions to the two-child limit
          • Work-related requirements if you have recently experienced domestic abuse
          • Separated but living in the same property
          • Value of property and its effect on means-tested benefits
        • Benefits for migrants
        • Debt
        • Housing costs
        • Personal independence payment
        • Sanctions and work-related requirements
        • Work capability assessment
      • Tools & templates
        • About our tools and templates
        • Universal credit
        • Migration to universal credit
        • Benefits for migrants
        • Personal independence payment
        • Work capability assessment
        • Revision, supersession and appeal procedure
        • Judicial review
        • All tools and templates
      • Benefits in Scotland
        • Scottish benefits
          • Children and young people
            • Pregnancy and baby payment
            • Early learning payment
            • School age payment
            • Best start foods
            • Scottish child payment
            • Residence rules for best start grant
            • Getting a best start grant if you are not getting a qualifying benefit
            • How to challenge a Social Security Scotland decision
          • Disability benefits
            • Child disability payment
            • Supporting information for child disability payment claims: suggestions for education staff
            • Child winter heating payment
            • Adult disability payment
            • Adult disability payment assessment
            • Scottish adult disability living allowance
            • Pension age disability payment
            • How to challenge a disability benefit decision
          • Help with council tax
            • Council tax reduction
            • Council tax reduction if you live with an adult who is not your partner
            • Council tax reduction if you live in a band E to H property
            • Calculating the new Scottish council tax reduction
            • Challenging a council tax reduction decision
            • When your council tax reduction starts
            • If you get council tax reduction and your circumstances change
            • Other ways to reduce your council tax bill
          • Benefits for carers
            • Carer support payment
            • Carer's allowance supplement
            • Young carer grant
            • How to challenge a Social Security Scotland decision
          • Help with heating costs
            • Child winter heating payment
            • Winter heating payment
            • Pension age winter heating payment
          • Scottish welfare fund
          • Other Scottish benefits
            • Universal credit Scottish choices
            • Funeral support payment
            • Discretionary housing payments in Scotland
            • Job start payment
        • More information about benefits in Scotland
          • Universal credit factsheets
            • Universal credit - the basics
            • Universal credit and students
            • Benefits for lone parent students
            • Kinship carers and universal credit
          • Families factsheets
            • Financial help in the early years
            • Financial help in the school years
            • Financial help for young parents
            • Parents claiming for young people in further education or training
            • Childcare costs: getting support
            • Children looked after by the local authority - impact on family benefits
            • Financial help for families fleeing domestic abuse
            • Universal credit for lone parent students
            • Financial help for families affected by imprisonment
          • Disability benefits factsheets
            • Benefits for disabled children and their families - a checklist
            • Benefits for disabled students
          • Benefits for migrants and refugees factsheets
            • Rights to benefits and tax credits for European nationals
            • EU citizen guide to claiming benefits in the UK
            • Benefits for new refugees
            • Benefits for resettled Afghans
            • Benefits for resettled Ukrainians
            • No recourse to public funds, person subject to immigration control and benefit entitlement
          • Kinship care factsheets
            • Kinship care and benefits – the essentials
            • Scottish child payment and kinship carers
            • Kinship carers and universal credit
          • Benefits for students and young people factsheets
            • Benefits for students
            • Benefits for care-experienced students
            • Benefits for disabled students
            • Benefits for young people in further education or training
            • Universal credit and students
            • Parents claiming for young people in further education or training
            • Benefits for lone parent students
            • Care-experienced young people and benefits
            • Students and carer support payment
          • Prison and benefits factsheets
            • Financial help for families affected by imprisonment
            • Prison and benefits
          • Veterans and benefits
        • Other CPAG resources on benefits in Scotland
      • Bulletins & articles
        • Welfare Rights Bulletin
        • Articles
        • eBulletins
      • Test cases
        • About legal test cases
        • Support with an Upper Tribunal case
        • Test case updates
        • Refer a test case
        • Support with the judicial review process
    • Get involved
      • Donate
        • Our supporter promise
      • Fundraise
        • Hold a fundraising event
        • Our fundraising heroes
        • Contact the fundraising team
      • A gift in your will
        • How to leave a gift in your will
        • The impact of your legacy
        • Supporter stories
          • Mike's story
          • Ruth's story
          • Gaynor's story
      • In memory
      • Membership
      • Our campaigns
      • Help our work
        • Share your experience of the benefits system
        • Advisers - tell us about your case
        • Voice network and Youth Voice
        • Tell us about your experience of Scottish child payment and other Scottish payments for families
    • Benefit rates
    • Shop
    • Training & events
    • Log in
    • CPAG Home