Skip to main content
CPAG Welfare Rights Home

User account menu

  • Log in

Utility menu - Welfare Rights

  • CPAG Home
  • Benefit rates
  • Shop
  • Training & events

Main navigation

  • Support for advisers
    • Advice line for advisers
    • Support for advisers in England and Wales
    • Support for advisers in Scotland
    • Tell us about your case
  • Handbooks
    • Online handbooks
    • Print handbooks
  • Key topics
    • PIP appeals
    • Maximising income
    • Universal credit
    • Migration to universal credit
    • Survivors of domestic abuse
    • Benefits for migrants
    • Debt
    • Housing costs
    • Personal independence payment
    • Sanctions and work-related requirements
    • Work capability assessment
  • Tools & templates
    • About our tools and templates
    • Universal credit
    • Migration to universal credit
    • Benefits for migrants
    • Personal independence payment
    • Work capability assessment
    • Revision, supersession and appeal procedure
    • Judicial review
    • All tools and templates
  • Benefits in Scotland
    • Scottish benefits
    • More information about benefits in Scotland
    • Other CPAG resources on benefits in Scotland
  • Bulletins & articles
    • Welfare Rights Bulletin
    • Articles
    • eBulletins
  • Test cases
    • About legal test cases
    • Support with an Upper Tribunal case
    • Test case updates
    • Refer a test case
    • Support with the judicial review process
Menu
Search

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Welfare rights
  3. Test cases and legal challenges
  4. Legal test cases

Universal credit, benefit cap and those paid 4 weekly

R (Pantellerisco and others) v SSWP [2020] EWHC 1944 (Admin); R (Pantellerisco and others) v SSWP [2021] EWCA Civ 1454
On 12 September 2019, CPAG issued judicial review proceedings on behalf of a single parent and her children challenging the application of the benefit cap to the mother’s universal credit award. The cap is applied to the mother despite the fact that she works 16 hours per week at national living wage, simply because she is paid 4 weekly rather than monthly. Permission to apply for judicial review was granted on 5 December 2019 and the case was heard on 12 May 2020. Judgment was given on 20 July 2020 with the court finding in the claimants' favour. The SSWP appealed to the Court of Appeal and judgment was given on 8 October 2021, allowing the SSWP's appeal.  Ms Pantellerisco applied for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court on 1/12/21 and this was refused by order dated 04/08/22. 
  • Summary
  • Background
  • Legal issues
  • What can a claimant in a similar position do?

Summary

Current status:  Concluded - permission to appeal refused by the Supreme Court (August 2022).

  • High Court judgment was given in the claimants' favour on 20 July 2020 (pdf) and the SSWP appealed to the Court of Appeal. 
  • The appeal was heard on 15 June 2021 and the Court of Appeal judgment was given on 8 October 2021 allowing the SSWP's appeal. 
  • An application was made by Ms Pantellerisco to the Supreme Court for permission to appeal (01/12/21) but this was refused in August 2022. 

Read the Court of Appeal judgment

Background

Ms Pantellerisco has always worked since she left school when she was 16. Initially she worked full-time but then moved to part-time work following the birth of her first child. As of November 2018 up until March 2020, she had been working as a home-carer for 16 hours per week at national living wage. Her employer paid her 4 weekly. In February 2019, her then relationship broke down and she contacted HMRC as she and her partner had been claiming tax credits on a joint claimant basis. She was told that she would have to claim UC which she did and found herself subject to the benefit cap because the wages she received in each assessment period are for 4 weeks’ work (other than for one assessment period per year in which she receives two lots of 4 weeks’ wages). This amounted to £525.44 (at the 2019/20 national living wage rate of £8.21 per hour) whereas the earnings exemption for the benefit cap, while based on 16 hours work per week at national living wage, was set at £569.23 (again 2019/20 rates) because it is calculated on a monthly basis.

The claimant tried to get her employer to pay her monthly but this was simply not possible. Nor could she increase her hours of work given her childcare responsibilities and her own health (she suffers from fibromyalgia). Being subject to the cap means that she has been forced to rely on a local foodbank and her children’s school for assistance with food, school uniforms and payment of gas and electricity bills.

Legal issues

High Court

The legal challenge was brought on the principal basis that the SSWP has adopted an unlawful approach to the calculation of earned income of people paid on a four-weekly basis rather than a calendar-monthly basis. As a result, for eleven twelfths of the year the claimant is treated as if she earned or worked for less than the required amount, and therefore subjected to the benefit cap.

At the time this case was argued before the High Court, the High Court decision in Johnson and others v SSWP [2019] EWHC 23 had not yet been superseded by the Court of Appeal judgment in that case ([2020] EWCA Civ 778). As such, the claimants relied on the High Court’s interpretation of regulation 54 of the Universal Credit 2013 regulations to argue that the SSWP’s approach to earned income is unlawful.

However, the claimants also argued that, if the SSWP’s approach to earned income calculation is in line with the legislation, it is irrational, at least for the purposes of establishing benefit cap exemption, and creates perverse outcomes. In light of the Court of Appeal judgment in Johnson, which focused on the irrationality of the treatment of the 'non-banking day shift' issue while rejecting the High Court’s interpretation of regulation 54, the court in the present case needed to consider the applicability of that judgment to the claimants’ situation.  

Further, it was argued that the SSWP’s approach is discriminatory in relation to those employees who are paid 4 weekly rather than monthly contrary to Art 14 ECHR, read in conjunction with Article 1 of the First Protocol and Article 8.

In its judgment, the High Court accepted that the Court of Appeal's reasoning in Johnson in relation to irrationality applied equally to, if not more forcefully, to the claimants' situation and that the SSWP's approach of treating the first claimant's earned income in 11 out of 12 assessment periods as only being her earnings for 28 days (even though she worked a full month) and so subjecting her to the benefit cap in those assessment periods was an approach that no reasonable Secretary of State would have taken.

Court of Appeal

The Secretary of State appealed to the Court of Appeal. The appeal hearing was on 15 June 2021 and judgment was given on 8 October 2021, allowing the appeal. (Read the Court of Appeal judgment.)

The principal argument of the Secretary of State at the appeal hearing was that it was a fundamental feature of the UC system that entitlement should be assessed by reference to actual receipts in a monthly assessment period and, additionally, that the earnings-related threshold for disapplication of the benefit cap should be set by reference to those same features (ie actual receipts in an assessment period).  Using a single yardstick for differing purposes could not be said to be irrational given the high threshold for establishing irrationality.  On behalf of the claimants, it was accepted that the choice of earnings received in a calendar month assessment period to establish benefit entitlement was one that was open to the Secretary of State.  However, it was contended that in so far as an in-work exemption for the benefit cap was concerned, what mattered was the amount of work undertaken not at what intervals a person received payment.  Since the position of people earning the national living wage and working 16 hours per week was identical whether or not they were paid monthly or 4 weekly (or indeed weekly or fortnightly) it was irrational to treat them differently.

In allowing the Secretary of State's appeal, the Court took as its starting point the question whether it was irrational for the Secretary of State not to modify the earnings-related exemption to the benefit cap to address what it termed the 'pay cycle effect'.  In answering that question in the negative, the Court considered that the High Court judge had erred in simply seeking to apply the approach in Johnson to the present case.  Unlike Johnson where the claimants were paid on a calendar monthly basis, addressing the 'pay cycle effect' would, in the view of the Court, require a departure from 'the straightforward and fundamental principle of working on the basis of actual receipts'.  This in turn would 'seriously impair the workability and reliability of the assessment of entitlement' for those affected'.  Given such an impairment, the Court found that it was not irrational for the Secretary of State to have not made any modifications.

Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was refused by the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, meaning that the Court of Appeal judgment is final. 

Read our Welfare Rights Bulletin article: UC: escaping the benefit cap and pay cycles (December 2021) for further discussion of the case (written prior to the Supreme Court's refusal of permission to appeal). 

What can a claimant in a similar position do?

Now that permission to appeal has been refused, the Court of Appeal's decision in favour of the SSWP is final. Any appeals within the tribunals system which were previously stayed behind the Pantellerisco case will now need to be decided. The human rights argument has not been decided by either the High Court or the Court of Appeal, and so it remains open to claimants to argue their appeals on that basis.

CPAG is continuing to call for the benefit cap to be scrapped not only for this group of 4-weekly paid claimants, but across the board. 

You can tell us about the impact of the cap, including on those in the same position as Ms Pantellerisco's, via our Early Warning System, to support our policy work in this area: Tell us about your case

You can read more about the Johnson case here: Universal credit, earned income and monthly pay

Test case
Published on
10 August 2022
Relevant to
all of the UK
Status
Concluded

    Advice for advisers

    Free, expert advice on benefit and tax credit issues if you’re a frontline adviser or support worker.

    Contact the advice line.

    • [email protected]
    • [email protected]

    WR Footer

    • Become a subscriber
    • Advice line for advisers
    • Training and events
    • eLearning
    • CPAG shop

    CPAG's Advice and Rights Team

    • Follow us on Twitter

    © 2025 CPAG | Child Poverty Action Group is a charity registered in England and Wales (registration number 294841) and in Scotland (registration number SC039339)

    Company limited by guarantee registered in England (registration number 1993854)

    Housekeeping (footer)

    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy policy
    • Cookies
    • Terms and conditions
    • Feedback and complaints
    Site built by Agile Collective
    End Child Poverty Fundraising Regulator badge with validation link
    • Child poverty in the UK
      • Poverty: facts and figures
      • What is poverty?
      • Causes of poverty
      • Effects of poverty
      • Ending child poverty
    • What we do
      • Our impact
      • Our objectives
      • Our campaigns
        • Imagine
        • End child poverty
        • End child poverty in Scotland
        • Scottish Campaign on Rights to Social Security
        • Past campaigns
      • Project work
        • Cost of the School Day
          • Resources for tackling poverty in schools
            • All Cost of the School Day resources
              • Talking about costs and money at school - advice from parents and carers
              • Create poverty aware school communities
              • Show leadership and take action
              • Communicate about costs and money
              • Offer confidential and supportive conversations
            • Toolkits
            • Calendar
            • eLearning
            • Ideas Bank
              • Awareness, values and ethos
                • Understanding poverty in your area
                • Cost of the School Day Information Booklet for Families
                • Nurturing approaches
                • Rebranding support to boost uptake
              • Entitlements and financial support
                • Boosting free school meal uptake
                • Family support staff
                • Offering support and referrals
                • Promoting support
              • School uniform
                • Simple, affordable and inclusive uniform policies
                • School and cluster run uniform banks
                • Providing new uniform and clothing
                • Parent-led uniform stall
              • Eating at school
                • Breakfast clubs
                • Breakfast, breaktimes and lunch
                • Boosting free school meal uptake
              • Consulting and planning
                • Listening to families
                • Parents leading consultation
                • Children consulting their school community
                • Whole school approaches
                • Creating a Cost of the School Day policy with learners
                • Cost of the School Day calendar, created by learners
              • Events, celebrations and fundraising
                • Pre-loved prom initiative
                • Supporting attendance and easing pressure
                • World Book Week in Dundee
                • Stress-free Halloween celebrations at school
                • Non-stigmatising online fundraising
              • Learners in the lead
                • Cost of the School Day pupil groups
                • Pupils asking parents and carers about costs
                • Young people sharing their views about uniform at the Scottish Parliament
                • Learners take universal free school meal call to the Scottish Parliament
                • Talking directly to politicians about cost barriers at school
                • Cost of the School Day pupil group interview their Headteacher
              • Communicating with families
                • Building relationships and keeping in touch
                • Open and clear written communication about support
                • Communicating commitment to equity
                • Letting everyone know
                • Engaging with partners in the community to share information with families
                • Improved attendance through support and communication
              • Trips, clubs and experiences
                • Funding trips
                • Offering support for trips
              • Learning and resources
                • Digital devices, connectivity and curriculum costs
                • Preparation station
                • After school study cafes
              • Local authority approaches
                • Equity in South Lanarkshire
                • Kit for all, Dundee
                • Financial inclusion support officers in Glasgow
                • Dundee City Council's Cost of the School Day
                • Involving young people in financial inclusion in East Ayrshire schools
              • Parental involvement
                • Parents in partnership
                • Parent equality groups
                • Working with parent groups on costs
            • Big Question report and film
          • Voice network and Youth Voice
            • Voice network in Scotland
            • Voice network news and opportunities - Scotland
            • Voice network activities - Scotland
              • Voice network activities - raising awareness
              • Voice network activities - asking everyone about costs
              • Voice network activities - taking action
            • Youth Voice in Wales
            • Youth Voice in England
          • Contact the Cost of the School Day team
          • The Cost of the School Day reports, blogs and briefings
        • Early Warning System
          • About the Early Warning System
          • Contact the Early Warning System team
          • Early Warning System findings
        • Managed migration
        • Projects in England and Wales
          • Cost of the School Day
          • Early Warning System
          • Secure Futures for Children and Families
          • Managed migration
          • Universal credit, digitalisation and the rule of law
          • Your Work Your Way
        • Projects in Scotland
          • Strengthening Social Security: research into the five family payments
      • CPAG in Scotland
      • The CPAG team
        • CPAG staff
        • CPAG trustees
        • CPAG's patron and ambassadors
        • CPAG trainers
    • Policy and research
      • Findings from our projects
        • The Cost of a Child reports
        • Cost of the School Day reports, blogs and briefings
        • Early Warning System findings
        • Managed migration research project findings
        • Your Work Your Way - findings from the project
        • Secure Futures for Children and Families
        • Universal credit, digitalisation and the rule of law
      • Our position
        • The two-child limit: our position
        • The benefit cap: our position
      • Policy briefings and reports
        • David Webster briefings on benefit sanctions
      • CPAG's Poverty journal
      • Policy books from CPAG
    • Welfare rights
      • Support for advisers
        • Advice line for advisers
        • Support for advisers in England and Wales
          • Support with the judicial review process
            • What judicial review is and how it can help
            • Judicial review template letters
              • Guide to using CPAG's judicial review pre-action letter templates
              • Universal credit and migration to universal credit
              • Other benefits and payments
              • Benefits for people in particular circumstances
              • Decisions, delays and challenging decisions
            • Pursuing to court and finding a solicitor
          • Support with an Upper Tribunal case
        • Support for advisers in Scotland
          • Advising low-income families in Scotland
          • Advising disabled people and carers in Scotland
          • Advising migrant groups in Scotland
          • Advising students in Scotland
          • Advising kinship carers in Scotland
          • Advising care-experienced young people in Scotland
          • Advising families with a child in the care system in Scotland
        • Tell us about your case
      • Handbooks
        • Online handbooks
        • Print handbooks
      • Key topics
        • PIP appeals
          • Introduction
          • Before you appeal
          • Submitting your appeal
          • Checking the law, facts and evidence
          • Writing the submission for your appeal
          • Your appeal hearing
          • What to do when you get the tribunal's decision
        • Maximising income
        • Universal credit
          • Universal credit - the basics
          • Universal credit and sanctions
        • Migration to universal credit
        • Survivors of domestic abuse
          • Financial help for families fleeing domestic abuse
          • Unwanted payments of abuser’s benefit into your account
          • Exceptions to the two-child limit
          • Work-related requirements if you have recently experienced domestic abuse
          • Separated but living in the same property
          • Value of property and its effect on means-tested benefits
        • Benefits for migrants
        • Debt
        • Housing costs
        • Personal independence payment
        • Sanctions and work-related requirements
        • Work capability assessment
      • Tools & templates
        • About our tools and templates
        • Universal credit
        • Migration to universal credit
        • Benefits for migrants
        • Personal independence payment
        • Work capability assessment
        • Revision, supersession and appeal procedure
        • Judicial review
        • All tools and templates
      • Benefits in Scotland
        • Scottish benefits
          • Children and young people
            • Pregnancy and baby payment
            • Early learning payment
            • School age payment
            • Best start foods
            • Scottish child payment
            • Residence rules for best start grant
            • Getting a best start grant if you are not getting a qualifying benefit
            • How to challenge a Social Security Scotland decision
          • Disability benefits
            • Child disability payment
            • Supporting information for child disability payment claims: suggestions for education staff
            • Child winter heating payment
            • Adult disability payment
            • Adult disability payment assessment
            • Scottish adult disability living allowance
            • Pension age disability payment
            • How to challenge a disability benefit decision
          • Help with council tax
            • Council tax reduction
            • Council tax reduction if you live with an adult who is not your partner
            • Council tax reduction if you live in a band E to H property
            • Calculating the new Scottish council tax reduction
            • Challenging a council tax reduction decision
            • When your council tax reduction starts
            • If you get council tax reduction and your circumstances change
            • Other ways to reduce your council tax bill
          • Benefits for carers
            • Carer support payment
            • Carer's allowance supplement
            • Young carer grant
            • How to challenge a Social Security Scotland decision
          • Help with heating costs
            • Child winter heating payment
            • Winter heating payment
            • Pension age winter heating payment
          • Scottish welfare fund
          • Other Scottish benefits
            • Universal credit Scottish choices
            • Funeral support payment
            • Discretionary housing payments in Scotland
            • Job start payment
        • More information about benefits in Scotland
          • Universal credit factsheets
            • Universal credit - the basics
            • Universal credit and students
            • Benefits for lone parent students
            • Kinship carers and universal credit
          • Families factsheets
            • Financial help in the early years
            • Financial help in the school years
            • Financial help for young parents
            • Parents claiming for young people in further education or training
            • Childcare costs: getting support
            • Children looked after by the local authority - impact on family benefits
            • Financial help for families fleeing domestic abuse
            • Universal credit for lone parent students
            • Financial help for families affected by imprisonment
          • Disability benefits factsheets
            • Benefits for disabled children and their families - a checklist
            • Benefits for disabled students
          • Benefits for migrants and refugees factsheets
            • Rights to benefits and tax credits for European nationals
            • EU citizen guide to claiming benefits in the UK
            • Benefits for new refugees
            • Benefits for resettled Afghans
            • Benefits for resettled Ukrainians
            • No recourse to public funds, person subject to immigration control and benefit entitlement
          • Kinship care factsheets
            • Kinship care and benefits – the essentials
            • Scottish child payment and kinship carers
            • Kinship carers and universal credit
          • Benefits for students and young people factsheets
            • Benefits for students
            • Benefits for care-experienced students
            • Benefits for disabled students
            • Benefits for young people in further education or training
            • Universal credit and students
            • Parents claiming for young people in further education or training
            • Benefits for lone parent students
            • Care-experienced young people and benefits
            • Students and carer support payment
          • Prison and benefits factsheets
            • Financial help for families affected by imprisonment
            • Prison and benefits
          • Veterans and benefits
        • Other CPAG resources on benefits in Scotland
      • Bulletins & articles
        • Welfare Rights Bulletin
        • Articles
        • eBulletins
      • Test cases
        • About legal test cases
        • Support with an Upper Tribunal case
        • Test case updates
        • Refer a test case
        • Support with the judicial review process
    • Get involved
      • Donate
        • Our supporter promise
      • Fundraise
        • Hold a fundraising event
        • Our fundraising heroes
        • Contact the fundraising team
      • A gift in your will
        • How to leave a gift in your will
        • The impact of your legacy
        • Supporter stories
          • Mike's story
          • Ruth's story
          • Gaynor's story
      • In memory
      • Membership
      • Our campaigns
      • Help our work
        • Share your experience of the benefits system
        • Advisers - tell us about your case
        • Voice network and Youth Voice
        • Tell us about your experience of Scottish child payment and other Scottish payments for families
    • Benefit rates
    • Shop
    • Training & events
    • Log in
    • CPAG Home