AEKM v Department for Communities (JSA)
Habitual residence test - requirement to have lived in the Common Travel Area (CTA) for past three months
BK v SSWP and SSWP v MM
Disability living allowance (DLA) - presence test – aggregation of periods of residence in UK and EU – ‘genuine and sufficient link’
JM v SSWP
Personal independence payment (PIP) - descriptor 6(b) (‘Needs to use an aid or appliance to be able to dress or undress’) – not necessary for a claimant to demonstrate difficulties with both dressing and undressing; need to use an aid or appliance for one or the other is enough
AH v SSWP
The 'required period condition' consists ofa three-month retrospective period and a nine- month prospective period - entitlement must be satisfied in each of those periods
AH v SSWP
Personal independence payment (PIP) - the 'required period condition' consists ofa three-month retrospective period and a nine- month prospective period - entitlement must be satisfied in each of those periods
KL v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - mobility - slow pace of walking
LS v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) – activity 9 (engaging with other people face-to-face)
MW v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - less favourable decision by tribunal – offer of adjournment not always necessary - representatives
JC v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - representatives – responsibilities when providing evidence to tribunals – medical records including highly confidential material
MH v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independent payment (PIP) - mobility component – ability to ‘follow the route of a journey’ – overwhelming psychological distress