EE v SSWP (CPIP)
Mobility – ability to plan and follow the route of a journey
R (Salvato) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Universal credit childcare costs – proof of payment requirement unlawful
CT v SSWP (ESA)
Overpayment and application of civil penalty – claimant was overpaid due to failure to disclose his occupational pension
SE v SSWP (PIP)
Claimant with borderline learning disability – re Activity 2 (reading and understanding), ‘basic written information’ refers to very basic information, but not so basic as to be of no practical use or value
Fratila and Tanase v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and another
Right to reside – pre-settled status – exclusion as valid right to reside for benefit unlawful
ED v SSWP
Claims and overpayments – claimant claimed and was granted asylum using a fictitious identity (not that of any real person) and later was awarded means-tested benefit also using that fictitious identity
HMRC v AD (CHB)
Child benefit – Zambrano right to reside not effective for entitlement
XTC v SSWP (DLA)
Disability living allowance – higher rate mobility component for severe mental impairment and behavioural problems
LG v SSWP (PIP)
Mobility – where claimant has walked at an airport when undertaking a trip abroad
BH v SSWP (PIP)
Tribunals – whether First-tier Tribunal, in considering refusal to award the claimant personal independence payment (PIP) on transfer from high rates of both components of disability living allowance (DLA), adequately explained its decision not to adjourn to get the DLA evidence