AH v SSWP
The 'required period condition' consists of a three-month retrospective period and a nine- month prospective period - entitlement must be satisfied in each of those periods
KL v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - mobility - slow pace of walking
LS v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) – activity 9 (engaging with other people face-to-face)
MW v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - less favourable decision by tribunal – offer of adjournment not always necessary - representatives
JC v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - representatives – responsibilities when providing evidence to tribunals – medical records including highly confidential material
MH v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independent payment (PIP) - mobility component – ability to ‘follow the route of a journey’ – overwhelming psychological distress
SSWP v LB (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - activity 3 (‘Managing therapy or monitoring a health condition’) – diabetes (not well controlled)
SF v The Secretary of State
Personal independence payment (PIP) - activity 9 (‘Engaging with other people face to face’) – the whole of Activity 9 is concerned with a claimant’s ability ‘to engage with other people face to face in social situation’
SK v SSWP
Pension credit (PC) - set-aside of Upper Tribunal decision - refusal to grant permission to appeal
KN v SSWP (ESA)
Employment and support allowance (ESA) - work-related activity – substantial risk – whether claimant could be accompanied