CM v SSWP
Medical evidence of publicly discredited assessor – to be given no weight
TK v SSWP (PIP)
Activities 1 (preparing food), 2 (taking nutrition) and 3 (managing therapy or monitoring a health condition)
CH v SSWP (PIP)
Tribunals – ‘protective essays’ (ie, regarding what the tribunal views the law requires for adequate reasoning) in tribunal written statements of reasons
JE v SSWP (PIP)
‘Vulnerable’ adult – brain injury leading to memory problems and fatigue – need to consider giving of evidence including from representative
IR v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - failure to attend medical – need for tribunal to see appointment letter
AA v SSWP
Tribunals – inconsistency between decision notice and summary of reasons is an error of law
GG v SSWP (PIP)
Tribunals – where claimant has a decision under appeal but in the meantime makes a fresh claim for the same benefit and that claim is decided by the decision maker
MP v Department for Communities (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - tribunals and medical evidence – review/audit procedure of official medical report resulting in alteration of report
MR v SSWP (PIP)
Daily living Activity six (dressing and undressing) – claimant with neurological problems had to sit on bed to dress but also needed to use crutches to stand up to put trousers on and fasten them - although a bed does not count as an aid, the tribunal erred in not considering that use of the crutches might be
SM v SSWP (PIP)
Daily living Activity nine (engaging with other people face to face) – general guidance