TH v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - reduction in award before end date - need to identify supersession ground
DV v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - activity 9 (Engaging with other people face to face) - visually impaired claimant
AB v SSWP
Personal independence payment (PIP) - Activity 9 (Engaging with other people face to face)
ML v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment - Activity 6 (Dressing and undressing)
DP v SSWP
Personal independence payment (PIP) - Activity 6 (Dressing and undressing) and Activity 10 (Making budgeting decisions)
PM v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - tribunal erred in placing emphasis on the possibility of claimant optimising her medication, given the expert opinion of her consultant that numerous medications had been discontinued because of adverse effects of lack of efficacy
RS-G v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment - mobility component
RC v SSWP
Personal independence payment (PIP) - less favourable decision by tribunal - need for 'sufficient notice' of intention to consider adverse decision - need to keep issue of whether to adjourn for an oral hearing under review
RJ, GMcL and CS v SSWP v RJ (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - ability to carry out an activity 'safely' - test is of a 'real possibility' of harm, not the occurrence of harm being 'more likely than not' - applies to need for supervision in same way
EG v SSWP (PIP)
Personal independence payment (PIP) - activity 7 (communicating verbally) and Activity 9 (engaging with other people face to face)-hearing-impaired claimant - regarding Activity 7 tribunal erred in assessing claimant's difficulties in communication overall rather than only by way of spoken word